- what the issuer says it authorizes;
- what the intended player markets permit;
- whether your payment and content partners accept the actual business.
A certificate or a low fee answers only part of that assessment.
Published fees and the source of the claim
Anjouan Gaming describes itself as the internet gaming authority operating under the Anjouan Offshore Financial Authority. Its published fee page lists €17,828 for issuance and €17,828 for annual renewal of either a B2C or B2B license, with €500 for each additional B2C domain or URL. These are the issuer's published figures, checked on October 17, 2026, rather than an all-inclusive SuperBluOrange quote.
Ask for an itemized proposal showing the legal applicant, license category, domains, due diligence, professional services and recurring obligations. Confirm whether any supplier needs separate authorization or recognition for the proposed arrangement. Avoid adding an agent's breakdown to the full published charge when both describe the same payment.
Read the standing issue within its actual scope
A Central Bank of the Comoros warning, republished by the Ministry of Finance, names Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority among entities it challenges in connection with banking and financial authorizations. The warning concerns that financial-services context. It should not be presented as a court judgment deciding the validity of every gaming license.
The issue still needs legal and commercial due diligence. Obtain the current legal basis, delegation and conditions for the exact gaming authorization offered, and have any unresolved authority question assessed before payment. This guide does not resolve that question by repeating the issuer's own description.
Test partner acceptance before optimizing the fee
Provide the intended payment processor and game suppliers with the entity, owners, domains, products and target markets. Ask for a decision on that configuration, including restrictions and any conditions still outstanding.
A processor accepting one licensee does not prove that it will accept another. Nor does the absence of a local licensing process establish that a country permits offshore gambling. Keep a market-by-market permission assessment alongside the issuer's restricted-territory list.
For a crypto-funded model, separately review wallet controls, custody, withdrawals, accounting and financial-crime responsibilities. Crypto changes the payment design; it does not remove the need to establish permission.
Make the selection with the gaps visible
Discuss the proposed route with the current issuer documents and supplier responses. SuperBluOrange can scope the technology and preparation work around a substantiated operating model. Compare Curaçao and the other licensing routes on equivalent responsibilities and total costs, not on the headline fee alone.