Match the evidence to the claim
Regulatory information should point to the relevant authority or legal source and identify the territory, activity and review date. Permission for one activity or country should not be presented as general permission to operate elsewhere.
Product descriptions explain the proposed service. Exact capabilities, third-party coverage, prices and delivery commitments belong in the agreement for the selected configuration. A supplier's published claim should be identified as that supplier's claim when it is used.
Worked examples are labeled as examples. Their assumptions, currency and calculation should be visible. They illustrate a decision; they are not a SuperBluOrange quotation or a forecast of the reader's performance.
Keep publication and review dates separate
A review date records when the stated sources were checked. It does not guarantee that a rule or commercial term remains unchanged. Before committing to a launch, readers should confirm the current requirements for their entity, product and intended players.
When a correction affects several pages, review their comparisons, metadata and links together. Removing a disputed number from one paragraph does not resolve a conflicting claim elsewhere.
Report a correction
Use the contact page to provide the page URL, the statement in question and the primary source or supporting document. Explain whether the issue concerns a factual error, a changed rule or an unclear description.
Please avoid including player data, identity documents or confidential account information in a general correction request. Where further evidence is needed, the team can establish an appropriate way to review it.